Donald Trump’s ego aside, can the size of the Inauguration crowd be a big deal? Of course not. Photographs and eyewitnesses clearly show that the crowd was smaller than in 2008. Why is it important for Trump to always be the biggest and the bestest? His narcissist exterior covers an insecure core. He can hardly believe he won himself. So his Achilles heel is the legitimacy of his election. He needs to have something etched in the record books to show he made a big splash. Otherwise, his press secretary would not have opened his first press conference stating that the Washington and global audience was the largest in history. The press, still stinging from campaign charges that they never called Trump on his lies, immediately called foul. And in doing so they took Trump’s bait.
We don’t know that if online streaming internationally is included, the global audience wasn’t the largest ever. It’s doubtful, given the historic significance for Obama’s inauguration, but it is 8 years since 2008, so there’s just a lot more web-based media outlets. That’s besides the point. The administration’s outrage at the reaction to the lie is the point.
The outrage is not an accident. It’s not that Trump’s gone off the rails or an inauspicious beginning aimed to coddle his base. It‘s part of a calculated strategy to promote his “movement” whose center is a “conviction that a nation exists to serve its citizens” as Trump said in his inaugural address. “From this day forward, it’s going to be only America first, America first”. Trump claims to be leading a nationalist movement that draws borders around the nation’s mission, dropping the curtain on global leadership that the US assumed during WWII. He’s building his brand.
Trump’s attack on the press is an escalation of his anti-media polemics during and after the campaign. Make no mistake, this is a calculated campaign to discredit the free press. As a bedrock of our democracy, our founding fathers guaranteed a free press in order to create a knowledgeable electorate that could participate in democratic processes. Remember Steve Bannon, whatever his politics, is an accomplished, innovative media strategist. He gained his present position as communications head for the Trump administration by his ingenious manipulation of social media, web-based false reporting and the spread of rumor and innuendo at Breitbart. Bannon used his tools to cement isolated crackpots and anti-government individuals with established Nazi, KKK and conservative right wingers (referred to now as the more palatable alt-right) into a political movement that went all out for Trump.
Another major strain has been the exploitation of the national trend to equate belief with fact. To paraphrase Newt Gingrich, when told that crime statistics show that the crime rate has been declining in contrast to the campaign assertions that it is rising, if the majority of people believe that it is true, then it is and he had to act as if it were true. Others propagating the belief as truth line include Reince Priebus and of course, Kelleyanne. Breitbart spread the seeds far and wide. The hegemony of science and facts, based on concrete evidence, has been supplanted by the elasticity of belief.
Other strains of the Trump attack on free press included demeaning the press as corrupt, united against the candidate in the hopes of defeating him. There were threats to individual reporters, called out by name including Megyn Kelly, exclusions of publications and reporters from Trump’s news entourage. All of this, done to delegitimize the ‘mainstream media’, paralleled by the development of alternative sources including conservative and right wing news outlets.
It is freedom of speech that permits free expression of all forms of speech across the political spectrum, ultra-right to ultra-left, even fake news. Thus the news can report whatever stories it chooses from whatever point of view. Traditionally, we have expected the print, radio and TV outlets to report well documented stories which have been verified by multiple sources. The development of the 24 hour news cycle has thrown much of that into disarray; Fox and CNN make no bones about reporting from a conservative perspective, so much for “objective reporting”. They specialize in breaking news where the reporter is the story. We follow him/her as they search for the news in the moment. Now we have the everyone man reporter; have phone will post. Why not, if they can make you believe in them.
Sean Spicer is free to say whatever he wants from the President’s news podium. It is our country’s expectation that the our chief executive will tell us the truth. Certainly, many Presidents have lied to the country, but having enjoyed a respite under Obama, we’ve forgotten how common it was. And the press has doggedly pursued the lies, precisely because it is a free press.
Trump, nurtured in the celebrity bubble, appears to have a different perception of the role of the press. Perhaps, his comfort with the falsehood derives words as celebrity publicity, to be contorted in ways that put the star’s best foot forward. He suffers from the delusion that the best press coverage says what you want it to. Trump was flying high when that’s exactly what happened during the campaign. Now the media is reeling from the sucker punches. Still Trump is more in control than not; the daily scramble to cover and the night’s Tweets continues.
But the press can report whatever it wants. A free press has no obligation to the Chief executive to say what he desires. The obligation is to the public. And that’s the part that’s wrangling Trump. So, he’s restricted access by avoiding the press, except through controlled interviews, short pronouncements in the Trump Tower Lobby. In his first press conference, delayed almost until inauguration, he bullied the press, even rising to the ultimate dirty word “Nazi”, while he castigated and refused to answer a question from a reporter from CNN which had reported the Russian “golden shower” rumor. Each time a press attack occurs, the administration threatens to limit press access. After the crowd count flurry, Kelleyanne glibly stated that Sean Spicer had offered “alternative facts” about crowd size. What is an alternative fact exactly? Is it similar to the “truth that is a lie” or the “lie that is the truth” that so dominated the campaign. The administration would have to “ rethink their relationship with the press” as has been rumored before. They may move the press core away from the White House, obviously there will be fewer press briefings.
Trump is maneuvering around the mainstream media; Tweets are only one part of it. President Deal Maker uses phone calls and closed meeting so he can disclose what he chooses and interpret it to his supporters and then secondarily to press. The White House will have it’s own social media apparatus. But by discrediting the mainstream press, he’s hoping that fewer and fewer people will believe them. In that spirit, Sean Spicer was back in a press conference saying that he had misspoken about the crowd number, never intentionally meaning to mislead the press. This is a cat and mouse game. To his supporters, Trump is continuing to make an effort with the unruly press. The press is hoping for a reprieve that will normalize the press corps. But then, Trump will use another occasion to bully and discredit them. The bully intimidates through capriciousness; the victim never knows when the hammer (and sickle, pun intended) will fall.
These activities have all the hallmarks of a dictator in the making. Destruction of a free press is vital to ongoing government control. Currently the Egyptian military and Turkey’s Erdogan, both countries that lack constitutional guarantees of a free press, have closed newspapers, harassed and detained reporters and exported dissidents. The state controls TV and radio. Russians, who have never known a free press nor possessed even a rudimentary understanding of democracy, get information that is completely controlled by the state. The vast majority of Russians believe Putin’s version of the world and its’ events, because they haven’t heard anything else. Vast stretches of Russia have no electricity, let alone internet access, so they are cut off from any web based alternative internet sources.
Is the strength of the Women’s March a wedge against Trump’s reign? Protests mean nothing if they don’t translate into political action. Remember Occupy Wall Street? In contrast, Tea Party is exemplary of a movement mobilized through local organizing into a political power at the national level in only 2 years. Take heed. We need to take another stab at draining the Washington swamp of the new oligarchs and as well as the old politicians. One election at a time, we can achieve what Trump said on January 17, “transferring power from Washington D.C. and giving it back to the people”. We mean the majority of the patchwork of the country that is the 99th, not Trump’s millionaire and billionaire one percenters.
Those who believe that people who voted for Trump do not have the same needs and hopes as those who marched should put their signs down and get back on their computers. We have to stop yelling at them about our rights and begin to find common ground to meet common goals, one issue at a time. That means we have to listen so we can hear their point of view. Most of them don’t actually believe that the fatcats are finally going to put them first; they’ve just been sold a bill a goods that “the others” are the problem, not the robber barons.
Make no mistake. Trump’s not listening even if protests movements put more people into the streets than his inauguration crowd. Because he doesn’t have to. He’s set for 4 years, unless he manages to blow us all up first.