The Problem is Not Biden’s Years, It’s His Mind Set  

democratic donkey

Joe Biden is old, but so are Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. Bernie shows his age, although he’s an energetic curmudgeon. Warren has aged more gracefully as they say, and has so much energy that she seems much younger than her years. Joe seems old because he’s been in national politics for so long. After all, this is the third time he’s run for president.

Biden is riding an African American high; his presence recalls fond memories of Barack for the Black community, a comfort in these times of craziness. He plans to use that cape to shield him from attacks by other more progressive contenders. But few people are familiar with his politics before Obama scooped him up, for the express purpose of holding the white working class within the Democratic coalition. In case people hadn’t noticed, he wasn’t all that successful at preventing his core support from wandering over to the Tea Party or just avoiding the polls. 

Kamala Harris highlighted some of Joe’s politics with her debate remarks about bussing to integrate primarily northern schools. Not only was Biden on the wrong side, taking refuge in local and states rights arguments, he refused to disavow his position today. If students have to wait on Biden cronies to abandon their prejudices against Black students in their white schools, no integration is going to happen in their neighborhoods. After all, they ran to the suburbs to get away from Black people moving in next door. They moved to those cozy suburbs to leave those Black students behind. If the schools don’t remain “good”, what happens to the home values that they’ve nursed along until they could retire to Florida or Arizona? The restrictive covenants are no accident.

Older African Americans, Biden’s core, have little real belief that their schools will get better. In their minds, Biden is not more flawed than any of the other candidates they’ve seen. They have hope, the spirit of the Black community that makes life bearable despite the daily assaults on all fronts, but they’re not betting on change. They just want to get back to a state of slow, steady progress rather than the leaps backward we’re seeing today. 

But Black millennials tend not to be so patient; they are not so enthusiastic. Unwilling to go with more of the same, Biden’s nomination may cause some to sit out the general election despite the overwhelming sense of urgency among the more politically active. Many Gen X- and Y-ers are tuning out as the Democratic primaries unfold. There are a number of rationales. They think government isn’t listening and thus is unresponsive; government is corrupted by money and special interests; elections are rigged, recognizing the truth in the triumvirate of gerrymandering, voter suppression and the electoral college that has delivered minority over majority rule to Republicans. For the party, faced with the opportunity to break new progressive ground, to settle for a back to pre-Trump candidate only plays into the cynicism of younger voters for the political process.

But Biden has a lot more skeletons in his closet. One big one is his handling of Anita HIll in the confirmation of Clarence Thomas. Thomas played the race card just right; he backed liberals into a corner by calling Hill’s allegations “a lynching for uppity Blacks.” Demonstrating that liberals’ commitment to Black civil rights, even if it was for an Uncle Tom like Thomas, far outstripped their theoretical commitment to women, they had to denigrate Hill so they could ignore her. Liberals have never been that discerning about Uncle Tom’s anyway. Biden for his part did some back door dealing to arrange the scheduling of witnesses before his committee to disadvantage Hill and to deliver the confirmation vote.

Many may be familiar with Biden’s support of various law and order bills, like third strike that spurred the wholesale incarceration of Black and LatinX men building the prison industrial complex. While he has expressed regret for his role in further enhancing the criminal injustice system, his response to the question in the third debate about reparations, illustrates his core beliefs.

“It’s not that they don’t want to help, they don’t want — they don’t know quite what to do…. make sure you have the record player on at night, the phone — make sure that kids hear words.”

Biden ended his response with “…bring social workers into homes of parents to help them deal with how to raise their children. It’s not that they don’t want to help, they don’t want — they don’t know quite what to do. Play the radio, make sure the television — excuse me, make sure you have the record player on at night, the phone — make sure that kids hear words. A kid coming from a very poor school — a very poor background — will hear 4 million words fewer spoken by the time they get there.” It wasn’t a gaff; it wasn’t simply that he fell back on political spin he’s used in the past. He has no filter, the source of his infamous gaffs, letting him say what he’s thinking, even when he doesn’t mean to. 

Biden’s just assumed that Black people are poor. He’s done this before during the campaign in a speech, saying “poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids.”, implying that Black kids are the poor. He tried to fix it by adding “Wealthy kids, black kids, Asian kids — no I really mean it, but think how we think about it.”  Actually, he meant how he  and his cronies think of it; there are wealthy Asian and Black kids and there are poor Asian, white and Black kids. LatinX, Asian and Black people understand that very well. He used racial categorizations to characterize individuals in each group. But in the context of a debate question about reparations, Biden had to be talking about African Americans.

Even more strikingly, Biden is attributing bad educational outcomes to the students themselves, right after he mentioned institutional segregation and redlining in real estate and bank loans. He proposed tripling Title I school funding and raising teacher salaries. Great, until he launched into regurgitation of the bad sociology of the 80s and 90s. The media fixated on the reference to record players, blithely encased in their middle class cocoons absent the understanding that there are vast rural areas in the west, midwest and south without internet access where poor folks aren’t streaming music and their phones are pay-as-you-go burners. Many a grandparent does enjoy their record player, either parenting full time (remember the opioid crisis, so it applies to whites and Blacks) or providing daycare. 

With record players center stage, the debunked statistics went unchallenged. Few in the mainstream media tackled the paternalistic assumption that if only social workers can teach  Black parents how to parent, their children will graduate from high school and college at comparable rates to whites. Apparently, food insecurity, violence in their communities, lack of school resources, biased disciplinary actions from teachers, tracking normal students into special needs classes can all be overcome by social workers tutoring parents so they know what to do. He didn’t wander into another historic talking point, lack of a father in the home, again just as common in white homes as in Black homes. But old Joe can take some of the credit for the absence of fathers. 

A lot of fathers are in jail or essentially unemployable in a decent job that supports a family on their release. Not that they live in areas brimming with economic opportunity, even with the lowest Black unemployment in 50 years. A closer look at the statistics will show that there are still many neighborhoods where unemployment still hovers between 10 and 20%. In Black majority cities like New Orleans, the African American unemployment rate is 11.5%; Atlanta, 11.3% while white unemployment rates of 2.5% and 2.3%. In Macon Georgia, the Black unemployment rate is 11.5%. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2019/06/26/black-workers-are-being-left-behind-by-full-employment/.

Are there differences from middle class social conventions that many poor, as opposed to only African Americans, share? In fact, it is white expectation and perception of variant behavior that begins a cascade of events that end in economic distress.

Are there differences from middle class social conventions that many poor, as opposed to only African Americans, share? In Hillbilly Elegy, J D Vance lays out quite a few variations within Appalachian culture that keep that community impoverished. Besides, Bill Gates and Donald Trump are examples of very successful people who didn’t comply with prevailing norms. Of course, 45’s behavior represents the criminal outliers where lying and cheating dominate a narcissistic pursuit of personal aggrandizement that is usually described as anti-social and punished. Compliance with conventions can be learned in the social marketplace, what Blacks call code-switching, if only poor Black kids weren’t burdened with the additional obstacles of racial bias and systemic racism. Old Joe acknowledged “systematic segregation” without apparently recognizing that it’s well entrenched in all American institutions and more importantly in minds like his. 

Perhaps, it is workplace culture that should be changed. Restrictions on natural African American hair styles including braids have been instituted in the military, where women say uniformly that it makes hair care much easier, particularly when stationed in places where no black hair salons are available. The military demands a neat appearance; apparently if it ain’t white; it ain’t neat. Issues are Black styling are not uncommon; if they are not restricted, they impact personnel evaluations.  

But workplace structure is not immutable; Silicon Valley has recreated workplaces in the tech world leading to better productivity. We don’t know how automation, typically reconfiguring workplaces in its wake will impact future jobs. FYI, Amazon has moved in the other direction for the non-tech workers. They’ve tightened their workplace restrictions to create even more inhospitable environments so that workers don’t get bathroom breaks. Facebook adjudicators of inappropriate content are forced to work long shifts watching psychologically damaging videos from snuff porn to beheadings and simulated violence, without bathroom breaks or psychological counseling. Of course these workers are in the Philippines and Southeast Asia where companies think workplace conditions don’t count because people will work for any near decent wage.  

In fact, it is white expectation and perception of variant behavior that begins a cascade of events that end in economic distress. Black boys are believed to be bigger, older and more aggressive than their white counterparts, ideas still with us from slave days. This causes white teachers to more severely discipline them more often, resulting in more assignments to special needs classes where they get bored and give up. In regular classes, lower expectations of Black students by teachers who are 85% white, undermine their best school performance. Students carry a sense of societal ostracism, reinforced by police harassment that makes for frustrated, hostile, men, angry at life. Their guilt over their failure stokes that anger. All of this is backed by extensive research.

In contrast, middle class Blacks, of which there are many, are less able to pass their class advantages onto their children. They have less choice of good housing and therefore schools; they have less wealth, as opposed to income, which can squeeze their offspring into the higher circles of influence where Biden lives. They are less able to pass their status and wealth on to their offspring.  

Here again, older Black Americans may not be perturbed by Biden’s assertions. They’ve heard these arguments before, from LBJ, Ronald Reagan and even Bill Cosby back in the day when he was a good guy. Many don’t like the gangsta stance with droopy pants; they think it misrepresents the race as outside the bounds of middle class norms that they studiously observed to try to get ahead. Never mind that middle class whites and the fashion industry have enthusiastically co-opted it. Older African Americans have accepted a measured, back and forth pace of progress toward equality. Younger people of color are less patient. Having grown up with THE Black president, they watched a racist response they hadn’t envisioned, thinking that racial progress moved in a straight line. And then the bottom fell out with the emergence of MAWA; they realize that the genie is out of the bottle and going back with Biden to Obama days is not enough. They want to move forward by leaps and bounds. 

If this is how Biden thinks about the problem of bad schools, his solutions will not include attacking the continuing segregation in 80% of Black children in schools or the residential and financial components that maintain that distribution. If he insists that disparities for Black communities are there fault rather than associated with systemic institutional racism.  That idea cripples his ability to make any meaningful change on other issues, like the economy, trade or climate change, which will consider the racial implications of the cause and the solutions including the collateral disadvantaging of minorities.

 The usual price African Americans have to pay in elections is what I call the Tweedle Dum-Tweedle Dee effect; no party has ever had our backs so we have to find the one that will do us the least harm. Since Richard Nixon took the GOP on the Southern Strategy path, we’ve been tethered to the Democratic Party which could safely ignore our concerns knowing we didn’t have another choice. The response of many is to stay home. However, the current crop of Democratic candidates offers the broadest range of choices ever in history. It would be a shame to throw it away by settling for Old Joe, in the name of electibilty. But then again, if the Dems feel compelled to cater to the white working class, steeped in their white privilege, it’s just one more step backward.

September 27, 1958 Little Rock Arkansas citizens voted to close public schools rather than integrate them. Schools remained closed for one year.

And the Emmy Goes to Donald Trump at the UN General Assembly

The RealityTVPresident addressed the UN General Assembly today about religious freedom. He had to find something to do to opt out of the discussions on climate change. No one was expecting him to acknowledge the existence of climate change although at the recent G7 meeting, he pushed back saying he supports the fossil fuel industry, a bedrock of the US economy instead of chasing pie in the sky energy alternatives. 45 made a quick appearance at the climate change forum because he can’t go to a meeting where he is silent and thus ignored. It’s sad that he missed Greta Thunberg’s impassioned address, but he’s not much of a listener anyway.

Instead, Agent Orange, spoke about religious freedom ironically only one day after his huge 2020 campaign rally with Indian prime minister Modi. It was just one more example of a foreign emerging despot lending a hand to the MAGA campaign. Trump is wooing the Indian community, not known as big supporters but often wealthy business persons. It’s a measure of his desperation for reelection that he’s this willing to embrace some people of color. But then again, they’re rich.

woman in white and red floral short sleeved dress holding maple leaf

Photo by ankiyay on Pexels.com

Modi recently revoked the independence of two provinces in Kashmir made up of primarily Muslim residents and held them imprisoned within the provinces without internet, TV or phone service for weeks. This was his latest move in fomenting Hindu anti-Muslim hostility that has caused other acts of violence across India.

Of course, Trump isn’t really concerned with the religious freedom of Muslims as evidenced by his rhetoric dating back to at least 911 but probably before. “Approximately 80% of the world’s population live in countries where religious liberty is threatened, restricted or even banned” Trump said perhaps thinking back to his evening with Modi. Mostly, he talks about the issue in terms of religious rights, a decidedly US evangelical phrase, rather than real people who are being isolated and confined, tortured and killed. But he gave an award winning performance, saying all the right words about an urgent moral duty to stop crimes against faith. “Today…[we] call upon the nations of the world to end religious persecution. Stop the crimes against people of faith. Release prisoners of conscience. Repeal laws restricting freedom of religion and beliefs. Protect the vulnerable, the defenseless and the oppressed.” 

But his words are cheap; he promises but there’s no substance underneath. That’s particularly true as he’s in campaign mode 24/7 these days. If he, himself, followed his impassioned words, he would marshal his powers of persuasion with his strongmen pals, Modi included, like Chinese President Xi Jinping on behalf of the Wiegers and other less well known Chinese minorities and even Netanyahu’s treatment of Palestinian Muslims. He could speak out over human rights violations internationally when they are revealed. And yet he remains silent as a lump of clay, a peculiar position for the human megaphone voice he uses on the issues that he holds dear, like the wall, anti-Central American asylum seekers and immigrants, anti-free trade, anti-environmental regulation.

This presentation was a Trump campaign reality play unfolding. He’s not talking to the headphone wearing audience in the room; he’s not concerned about the oppression of minorities whose religion is becoming life threatening; he’s speaking to the Trump/FoxNews viewers. “Look how I’m standing up for you evangelicals”, the group least at risk for religious tyranny. He’s also hoping to scoop up more of the Jewish audience enthralled with the idea that criticism of Netanyahu is anti-semitism. He’s adding this to his rally list of accomplishments, like moving the US Embassy to Jerusalem, the appointment of conservative Supreme Court justices, the creation of an office to pursue violations of religious freedom in the Justice Department and HHS, Mike Pence’s bible study in the West Wing and regular White House luncheons for evangelical leaders. Like witches around a boiling kettle, he’s stirring up a brew of campaign magic.

On September 23, 1955 an all white jury in Mississippi acquitted Roy Bryant and J.W. Milam of the murder of Emmett Till.